Written advocacy anchored to the record.

A brief should show the tribunal where the controlling facts are, why the evidence is admissible, which standard governs, and what result the record permits.

Maimonis Law’s Written Advocacy section presents selected public filings and case analyses that demonstrate how complex records are organized and argued.

Featured Commission brief: Donna Halters v. City of Chicago

Document: Respondent’s Statement of Exceptions and Supporting Brief
Forum: Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission
Client: City of Chicago
Counsel: Alexis E. Maimonis
Case numbers: 98 WC 08446, 99 WC 12367, 00 WC 07978, and 00 WC 14135

The claimant filed four Section 19(h) petitions alleging material increases in disability involving the right knee, right arm, cervical spine, and lumbar spine. The proceedings also included an allegation of permanent total disability.

The record included five evidence depositions, later surgeries, full-duty releases, later work and nonwork accidents, competing medical opinions, two vocational perspectives, labor-market evidence, and an odd-lot theory.

The brief:

Organized the evidence by body part and original award
Compared the condition at the initial hearing with the later condition
Addressed intervening accidents and causal breaks
Challenged medical opinions based on incomplete or inaccurate histories
Compared physician specialties and objective findings
Analyzed work capacity, transferable skills, labor-market evidence, and odd-lot proof
Argued that neither a material increase nor permanent total disability had been established

First page of the Donna Halters Respondent’s Statement of Exceptions and Supporting Brief. — First page

Signature page identifying Alexis E. Maimonis as counsel for the City of Chicago. — Signature page

Dispositive motions

The library will include selected federal and state summary-judgment motions and orders. Each entry should present:

The claim
The dispositive issue
The record developed
The legal standard
The ruling
The practical effect

Commission and trial briefs

Additional materials will include:

Statements of exceptions
Arbitration briefs
Medical-causation briefs
Section 19(b) and 19(h) briefing
PTD and wage-differential analysis
Subrogation and lien submissions
Selected motions in limine and evidentiary filings

Editorial standard

Public materials will be redacted or summarized where necessary to protect confidential, privileged, personal, or nonpublic information. The purpose is not to publish a client file. It is to demonstrate the legal issue, evidentiary method, and written analysis.

View Representative Litigation

Send a Matter for Review

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.